News & Views
Housing Law | Thursday 3 August 2017
The Garden Court Chambers Housing Team respond to the consultation of Terms of Reference of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry
The Grenfell Tower Inquiry has called for responses to the consultation of Terms of Reference.
Housing Law | Tuesday 1 August 2017
Appeal against Southwark’s decision that woman with auto-immune disorder and depression was not a ‘vulnerable’ homeless person in priority need
Liz Davies of the Garden Court Chambers Housing Team represented the appellant.
Housing Law | Wednesday 26 July 2017
'The consequences of wealth before homes': Liz Davies on the implications of the Grenfell Tower tragedy
Liz Davies is a member of the Garden Court Chambers Housing Team.
Administrative and Public Law, Civil Liberties and Human Rights, Community Care Law | Thursday 20 July 2017
Proof magazine #3: ‘Life in the Justice Gap: Why legal aid matters’ launch supported by Garden Court Chambers
Garden Court Chambers is proud to sponsor Proof magazine. The third issue of Proof was co-produced by the Justice Gap and the Justice Alliance.
Housing Law | Friday 16 June 2017
Immediate housing duties owed to victims of fires
Homelessness duties owed by the local authority to former residents of Grenfell Tower.
Housing Law | Thursday 15 June 2017
Homelessness Reduction Act 2017: Tackling homelessness early
Liz Davies of Garden Court Chambers writes in June’s edition of Legal Action magazine on the Homelessness Reduction Act 2017.
Administrative and Public Law, Civil Liberties and Human Rights, Claims Against the Police and Public Authorities | Friday 21 October 2016
Garden Court and Stephanie Harrison QC shortlisted for Human Rights and Public Law awards
Garden Court has been shortlisted at the Chambers Bar Awards, whilst Stephanie and our Public Law Team are shortlisted at the Legal 500 Awards.
Garden Court Chambers | Thursday 8 September 2016
Section 204 Housing Act Appeal: local authority was perverse to characterise acceptance whilst seeking review as refusal
Liz Davies of Garden Court Chambers represented the appellant.
